DEAR CUSTOMERS AND PARTNERS!

We inform you that in connection with the repair work our office has moved to a new address – Plyushchikha str., 10.

Phone numbers and postal address are the same.

We have plans to return to our updated office at the previous address by the end of this year.

 

ON MARCH 21, 2019 HEAD OF MCBA “BUREAU OF LAWYERS “DE-JURE” N.V. FILIPPOV TOOK PART IN PUBLIC HEARINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL 21+

In his speech, Nikita Vladimirovich briefly told the history of the Bill, gave strong arguments for its early adoption, he proposed to establish responsibility for the sale of alcoholic and alcohol-containing products for both legal entities and individuals. He also expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the partial (only for strong alcoholic drinks) ban on…

APPEAL DECISION OF THE MOSCOW CITY COURT CANCELLED THE DECISION OF ZAMOSKVORETSKY DISTRICT COURT OF MOSCOW ON REFUSAL TO CITIZEN B* IN RESTORATION OF THE MISSED PROCEDURAL PERIOD FOR FILING AN APPEAL

LLC KB “S…” (Plaintiff) appealed to Zamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow and filed a statement of claim against citizen B* (Defendant) for recovery credit debt under overdraft agreements. By the decision of Zamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow the requirements of LLC KB “S …” were satisfied in full. At the same time in violation of…

BY A DECISION OF ZAMOSKVORETSKY DISTRICT COURT OF MOSCOW, THE CLAIM AGAINST OUR PRINCIPAL WAS DENIED, AND OUR COUNTERCLAIM WAS SATISFIED IN FULL

MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” protects the rights and legitimate interests of one of the prestigious educational institutions of Moscow – “P”. The Plaintiff (citizen K*) appealed to court of Moscow and filed a statement of claim against the Defendant (our Principal) on the refund of money for the education of her child, as…

ARBITRATION COURT OF THE MOSCOW DISTRICT UPHELD THE DECREE OF THE NINTH ARBITRATION COURT OF APPEAL AND THE DECISION OF MOSCOW ARBITRATION COURT ON FULL SATISFACTION OF THE CLAIMS OF OUR PRINCIPAL IN THE AMOUNT OF 15 000 000 RUBLES.

The Company “1” (hereinafter the Plaintiff, the Principal) appealed to MCBA “Bureau of Lawyers “De jure” to provide them with legal assistance in protection of their violated rights having explained that between them and the Company “2” (hereinafter — the Defendant, Contractor, Forwarder, Carrier) a public offer Agreement for the provision of delivery services was…